総説・解説等

© 2018 The Author(s). This Article contains an error in the Results section under the subheading 'Performance comparison among call methods using simulation data'. We found that when the insertions were ?2 bp length and contained repetitive sequence from the flanking region, de novo assembly (Inchworm) did not work well (Table S3)." should read: We found that when the insertions were ?25 bp length and contained repetitive sequence from the flanking region, de novo assembly (Inchworm) did not work well (Table S3).".

© 2019, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Japan Society of Human Genetics. Since the publication of this article, it has been brought to our attention, that the identified mutation (NM_015277: c.2617 G > A; p.Glu873Lys) is identical with the mutation (NM_001144967: c.2677 G > A; p.Glu893Lys) reported by Broix et al (Nature Genetics 48, 1349–1358, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3676). Therefore the mutation is not novel but recurrent. Accordingly, the word “novel” should be deleted throughout the article including the title. Thus, the title should read “A missense mutation in the HECT domain of NEDD4L identified in a girl with periventricular nodular heterotopia, polymicrogyria, and cleft palate.”