Published papers

Recent cancer immunotherapy development with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown durable clinical responses in a wide variety of tumor types. These drugs targeting programmed cell death 1, its ligand programmed death ligand 1 and cytotoxic T cell lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 have revolutionized the field of cancer treatment. It is of significant interest in optimizing the immunotherapy for cancer patients beyond the conventional treatments such as surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Many clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of various combined regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors have been reported and are in progress. Among gynecologic malignancy, endometrial cancers have distinct subtypes with microsatellite instability-high status and polymerase ɛ mutation. These types have been shown to immunogenic tumors and appropriated candidate for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Also, recurrent cervical cancer showed a promising objective response with single anti-PD1 Ab treatment. Despite their definite outcome and considerable potential of immunotherapy, not all patients received a survival benefit and further understanding of human tumor immunology is essential to improve this type of therapy. In this review, we have summarized the updated results of clinical trials of cancer immunotherapy for gynecologic malignancies and discussed the future perspectives.

Aim: Tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used in adjuvant endocrine therapy for invasive breast cancer as a selective estrogen modulator, but this treatment has a risk of developing endometrial malignancy. However, hysteroscopic findings during or after TAM treatment are unclear. The aim of this study is to examine the association between hysteroscopic patterns and malignant histological findings during or after treatment with TAM. Methods: The subjects were patients who received TAM after surgery for breast cancer and underwent hysteroscopy at our institution from January 2016 to December 2019. Clinicopathological factors and hysteroscopic findings were collected from medical records and investigated retrospectively. Histologically, atypical endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, and carcinosarcoma were classified as malignant diseases. Results: A total of 26 patients were eligible for the study. Hysteroscopic findings included an irregular surface of the endometrium (n = 3, 11.5%), atypical vessels (n = 10, 38.5%), papillary structure (n = 3, 11.5%), and polypoid structure (n = 18, 69.2%). Histological examination revealed malignancy in six patients (23.0%). The percentage of atypical vessels in patients with malignancies was significantly higher than that in patients with a normal endometrium or benign lesion (100% vs. 20%, p = 0.0009). The sensitivity and specificity of atypical vessels in hysteroscopy for diagnosis of malignant diseases were 100% and 80%, respectively. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic findings of atypical vessels may be useful for prediction of malignant diseases in patients treated with TAM.

Objective: To determine the efficacy of drainage following pelvic lymph node (PLN) dissection, especially for cases involving laparoscopic surgery. Methods: In this retrospective study, 368 patients with malignant gynecological tumors who underwent systemic PLN dissection at Keio University Hospital between January 2012 and October 2018 were enrolled. Drainage tubes were placed in the retroperitoneal fossa in all patients. Medical records were used for data collection. Results: Laparoscopy was performed on 81 patients, and laparotomy was performed on 287 patients. In the laparoscopy group, tubes were removed 1 day post surgery. In the laparotomy group, tubes were removed 1 day post surgery in 167 patients and 4 days post surgery in 120 patients. Compared with the laparotomy group, we determined the laparoscopy group to have a significantly lower prevalence of lymphocyst (6.2% vs 20.2%, p = 0.002) but a similar prevalence of lymphedema (4.9% vs 5.2%), and symptomatic lymphocyst (2.5% vs 4.5%). The two laparotomy groups did not differ significantly with respect to the prevalence of lymphedema (4.8% vs 5.8%), lymphocyst (20.4% vs 20.0%), or symptomatic lymphocyst (4.2% vs 5.0%). Conclusion: Our results suggest that routine drainage should be omitted, especially in cases involving laparoscopic surgery.

Objective: Associations between hospital treatment volume and survival outcomes for women with 3 types of gynecologic malignancies, and the trends and contributing factors for high-volume centers were examined. Methods: The Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology tumor registry databased retrospective study examined 206,845 women with 80,741, 73,647, and 52,457 of endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumor, respectively, who underwent primary treatment in Japan between 2004 and 2015. Associations between the annual treatment volume and overall survival (OS) for each tumor type were examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model with restricted cubic splines. Institutions were categorized into 3 groups (low-, moderate-, and high-volume centers) based on hazard risks. Results: Hazard ratio (HR) for OS each the 3 tumors decreased with hospital treatment volume. The cut-off points of treatment volume were defined for high-(≥50, ≥51, and ≥27), moderate-(20–49, 20–50, and 17–26), and low-volume centers (≤19, ≤19, and ≤16) by cases/ year for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed younger age, rare tumor histology, and initial surgical management as contributing factors for women at high-volume centers (all, p<0.001). The proportion of high-volume center treatments decreased, whereas low-volume center treatments increased (all p<0.001). Treatment at high-volume centers improved OS than that at other centers (adjusted HR [aHR]=0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.78–0.88; aHR=0.78, 95% CI=0.75–0.83; and aHR=0.90, 95% CI=0.86–0.95 for endometrial, cervical, and ovarian tumors). Conclusion: Hospital treatment volume impacted survival outcomes. Treatments at high-volume centers conferred survival benefits for women with gynecologic malignancies. The proportion of treatments at high-volume centers have been decreasing recently.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability-high is a known biomarker for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint therapy. It is also a known tumour feature of Lynch syndrome, detected most frequently in endometrial cancer. However, it remains unclear how microsatellite instability testing is carried out in the clinical field. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients with gynaecological malignant tumours who underwent microsatellite instability testing as a companion diagnosis for pembrolizumab and 16 patients who previously underwent microsatellite instability testing as a screening for Lynch syndrome were recruited. Clinical information, microsatellite instability status, outcomes, genetic assessments and information about cancer tissue were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients had 101 gynaecologic malignant tumours including 26 endometrial, 38 ovarian and 28 cervical cancers, 9 with other tumours including 2 synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers. All tissue samples were successfully tested, even though some were ≥10-year-old samples. Three cases (3.0%, 3/99) showed microsatellite instability-high; all cases were endometrial cancers with one case of synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer [11.5% (3/26) in endometrial cancer, 2.6% (1/38) in ovarian cancer], and there was no microsatellite instability-high in cervical and other cancers. One of the endometrial cancer patients received pembrolizumab treatment, but finally died of cancer. Two other cases underwent genetic testing; both were diagnosed as Lynch syndrome. Six cases (37.5%) showed microsatellite instability-high in screening for Lynch syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Microsatellite instability-high was less commonly detected as a companion diagnosis for pembrolizumab in unselected gynaecologic patients. Genetic counselling should be always provided along with treatment selection.

INTRODUCTION: The significance of endometrial cytology in determining the therapeutic efficacy of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of endometrial cytology during MPA therapy. METHODS: Overall, 77 patients who underwent dilatation and curettage (D&C) to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MPA therapy at our hospital between January 2018 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of D&C, cytological evaluation, and other clinicopathological factors were analyzed based on the patients' medical records. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of cytology were 61% and 92%, respectively, with D&C being the gold standard for diagnosis in 142 D&C/cytological examinations. Among patients with no residual disease on D&C, 5 (4%) had suspicious or positive cytology. Although MPA therapy was terminated in 3 of these patients, only 1 patient had early recurrence, and the frequency of recurrence was similar to that of patients who showed negative results in both D&C and cytology. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of endometrial cytology in determining the therapeutic effect of MPA therapy is low, and we confirmed that the omission of D&C is unacceptable. Our findings also suggested that the addition of cytological evaluation to D&C during MPA therapy had a low clinical significance.

: . ,

Although endometrial cancer management remains challenging, a deeper understanding of the genetic diversity as well as the drivers of the various pathogenic states of this disease has led to development of divergent management approaches in an effort to improve therapeutic precision in this complex malignancy. This comprehensive review provides an update on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and molecular classification, recent advancements in disease management, as well as important patient quality-of-life considerations and emerging developments in the rapidly evolving therapeutic landscape of endometrial cancers.

Oncogenic signalling confers tumour-progression advantages; thus, its pharmacological blockade is the best strategy for cancer chemotherapy. However, drug resistance and heterogeneous dependency of tumour hamper their therapeutic potential, suggesting the necessity for a new ubiquitous modality based on evading drug resistance. Here, we proposed a denovoaddiction to oncogenic signalling (Dead-On) concept, wherein specific blockade of target molecules forces cancer cells to develop dependency on an oncogenic signalling. In cervical squamous cell carcinoma cells, Aurora A/B dual blockade elicited rapid addiction to EGFR–Erk signalling, and its pharmacological/genetic inhibition synergistically enhanced anti-cancer activities in vitro, in vivo, and in a patient-derived organoid model. The signal activation was independent of EGFR genetic status, it was triggered by receptor accumulation on the plasma membrane via Rab11-mediated endocytic recycling machinery. These findings support our novel Dead-On concept which may lead to drug discovery as well as expand the adaptation of approved targeted drugs.

Purpose: To date, no studies have assessed climacteric symptoms after hystero-adnexectomy for endometrial, cervical, or ovarian cancer. Thus, this study aimed to compare climacteric symptoms among patients who underwent surgery for these three cancer types. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we interviewed patients who were registered at a menopausal outpatient clinic between January 1999 and July 2016 after undergoing total hysterectomy, intrapelvic only or intrapelvic plus para-aortic lymph node dissection, and bilateral adnexectomy performed via laparotomy as a cancer treatment. Climacteric symptoms were assessed using a patient-reported questionnaire covering core domains with five symptoms only at the initial consultation. Each symptom was graded from 0 (no symptoms) to 3 (severe symptoms). We evaluated the frequency of symptom severity according to the time elapsed since surgery and the cancer type. Results: The numbers of patients with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer were 328, 90, and 107, respectively. Overall, climacteric symptoms were more severe in patients with cervical cancer than in those with endometrial or ovarian cancer; symptom severity decreased with increasing time since surgery. However, symptom severity did not decrease significantly over time in patients with cervical cancer even after > 5 years had elapsed since surgery. Conclusion: The climacteric symptoms were less severe in patients with endometrial or ovarian cancer with longer time elapsed since surgery but not in those with cervical cancer. Patients with cervical cancer may require more prompt interventions, including symptomatic treatment and longer follow-up period, than those with endometrial or ovarian cancer.

Objective: Human papillomavirus subtypes are predictive indicators of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) progression. While colposcopy is also an essential part of cervical cancer prevention, its accuracy and reproducibility are limited because of subjective evaluation. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that can accurately detect the optimal lesion associated with prognosis using colposcopic images of CIN2 patients by utilizing objective AI diagnosis. Methods: We identified colposcopic findings associated with the prognosis of patients with CIN2. We developed a convolutional neural network that can automatically detect the rate of high-grade lesions in the uterovaginal area in 12 segments. We finally evaluated the detection accuracy of our AI algorithm compared with the scores by multiple gynecologic oncologists. Results: High-grade lesion occupancy in the uterovaginal area detected by senior colposcopists was significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients with CIN2. The detection rate for high-grade lesions in 12 segments of the uterovaginal area by the AI system was 62.1% for recall, and the overall correct response rate was 89.7%. Moreover, the percentage of high-grade lesions detected by the AI system was significantly correlated with the rate detected by multiple gynecologic senior oncologists (r=0.61). Conclusion: Our novel AI algorithm can accurately determine high-grade lesions associated with prognosis on colposcopic images, and these results provide an insight into the additional utility of colposcopy for the management of patients with CIN2.

There are no criteria for patient selection for ovarian-preserving surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). In this study, intraoperative findings of ovarian swelling (OvS) and the clinicopathological features of patients with EC with or without ovarian metastasis were analysed to identify risk factors for ovarian metastasis. Patients who underwent surgery for EC between 2012 and 2019 at our hospital were enrolled. In univariate analysis, all features were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and OvS were significant risk factors. In univariate analysis in stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly higher in metastasis(+) cases. LSI, CSI, and OvS were significant risk factors in multivariate analysis. Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI and extrauterine lesions are appropriate for ovarian preservation. IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? The number of premenopausal patients with endometrial cancer (EC) is increasing. Bilateral oophorectomy for EC results in surgical primary ovarian insufficiency, and thus, surgery with ovarian preservation has been examined. However, there are few reports on risk factors for ovarian metastasis of EC and no established criteria for patient background or pathological factors to determine suitability for ovarian preservation surgery. What do the results of this study add? In univariate analysis, all pathological findings suggestive of disease progression were more frequent in cases with ovarian metastases. In multivariate analysis, lymphatic space invasion (LSI), cervical stromal involvement (CSI), peritoneal dissemination, and ovarian swelling (OvS) were identified as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis. In an analysis of stage I and II cases classified without adnexal pathological factors, type 2 histologic type, LSI, CSI, and OvS were significantly more common in cases with ovarian metastasis, and LSI, CSI, and OvS emerged as significant risk factors for ovarian metastasis in multivariate analysis. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients with type 1 histologic type EC without depth of myometrial invasion ≥1/2, CSI, or extrauterine lesions may be appropriate cases for ovarian preservation.

Background: Olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer has been approved in Japan since April 2018. Here, we report the experience administering this therapy in our hospital, with the aim of evaluating efficacy and safety in the Japanese population. Methods: The study included 52 patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. All patients started olaparib at a dose of 300 mg twice daily. Information about treatment efficacy and adverse effects was collected retrospectively from medical records. Results: Median age was 58 years old (range: 33–80), and 82.7% of the patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma. Sixteen patients (30.8%) possessed the BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant (15 germline and 1 tissue), 3 (5.8%) possessed variants of unknown significance (2 germline and 1 tissue), 16 (30.8%) possessed wild type, and 17 (32.7%) were not analyzed. Median progression-free survival was 15.3 months (95% CI 9.0–21.6). Patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants showed significantly longer PFS than patients with wild-type BRCA1/2 (p = 0.007). Disease progression caused 34 cases to discontinue olaparib. Eighteen (34.6%) individuals exhibited ≥ grade 3 anemia, although they recovered in response to appropriate management. One patient discontinued olaparib because of prolonged renal dysfunction. Another patient presented with grade 3 fatigue, but recovered after 2 weeks of interruption and continued olaparib treatment. Conclusion: Olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in the Japanese population is sufficiently safe and no less effective than reports from previous studies.

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) is being increasingly used for the routine clinical management of solid cancers. In July 2018, the use of tumor tissue-based CGP assays became available for all solid cancers under the universal health insurance system in Japan. Several restrictions presently exist, such as patient eligibility and limitations on the opportunities to perform such assays. The clinical implementation of CGP based on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is also expected to raise issues regarding the selection and use of tissue DNA and ctDNA CGP. A Joint Task Force for the Promotion of Cancer Genome Medicine comprised of three Japanese cancer-related societies has formulated a policy proposal for the appropriate use of plasma CGP (in Japanese), available at https://www.jca.gr.jp/researcher/topics/2021/files/20210120.pdf, http://www.jsco.or.jp/jpn/user_data/upload/File/20210120.pdf, and https://www.jsmo.or.jp/file/dl/newsj/2765.pdf. Based on these recommendations, the working group has summarized the respective advantages and cautions regarding the use of tissue DNA CGP and ctDNA CGP with reference to the advice of a multidisciplinary expert panel, the preferred use of plasma specimens over tissue, and multiple ctDNA testing. These recommendations have been prepared to maximize the benefits of performing CGP assays and might be applicable in other countries and regions.

Objectives: ARID1A mutation is frequently found in clear cell ovarian cancer (CCC) and endometrioid ovarian cancer (EC). Anti-PD-1 monotherapy has been found to have limited efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer; however, anti-PD-1 therapy showed significant clinical benefit in some CCC. We sought to define the relationship of ARID1A mutation/ARID1A expression to the immunogenic profile of different histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer. Methods: We performed next-generation sequencing of 160 cancer-related genes. Also, we analyzed the immunohistochemical status of ARID1A, PD-L1, and CD8 with survival in different histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer in a total of 103 cases. Results: ARID1A mutation was found in 0% of the high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) (n = 36), 41.5% of the CCC (n = 41), 45.0% of the EC (n = 20), and 33.3% of the mucinous ovarian cancer (MC) (n = 6) cases. ARID1A loss was found in 19.4% of the HGSC, 75.6% of the CCC, 60.0% of the EC and 0% of the MC cases. ARID1A mutation was found to be associated with high PD-L1 (p < 0.001) or CD8 levels (p < 0.001) in CCC but not in other histologic subtypes. Meanwhile, ARID1A loss was associated with high PD-L1 or CD8 levels in CCC (p < 0.001) and HGSC (p < 0.001) but not in EC and MC. In addition, ARID1A mutation was associated with high tumor mutation burden in CCC (p = 0.006). Conclusions: ARID1A mutation/ARID1A expression is associated with immune microenvironmental factors in CCC but not in EC. ARID1A status can be a biomarker for selecting candidates for immune checkpoint blockade in CCC.

Background: The Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by congenital vaginal defects and uterine traces. Because of its rarity, standardized management for MRKH syndrome is unavailable. This study reviewed the management of the patients with MRKH syndrome in our institution. Methods: Using medical records, we retrospectively reviewed the surgical techniques, outcomes, postoperative management methods, and outpatient follow-up of 17 patients with MRKH syndrome in Keio University Hospital. Results: Of the 14 patients who requested vaginoplasty, 12 underwent surgery with Davydov’s modified procedure after the Frank method, and it took 17 months to 34 months (median two years) for the vaginal cavity to enlarge by 5–6 cm. The Frank method is a non-surgical dilation with instrumental stretching of the vaginal vestibular mucosa. Davydov’s procedure is a surgical vaginoplasty in which the vesicoureteral space is coated by the peritoneum. Although one patient lost 3800 mL of bleeding from the plexus vein and four needed to remove the prosthesis under anesthesia about one month after surgery, all patients achieved anatomic success with a vaginal cavity length of 6 cm or more and could have sexual intercourse with their sexual partners. However, two patients interrupted their preoperative hospital visits, and three were lost to follow-up postoperatively. Two of the three patients who did not accept vaginoplasty presented myoma at uterine trace and underwent myomectomy. Another one was scheduled for surgery through psychological support. Conclusions: Davydov’s modified procedure is effective, and dilating the vaginal cavity adequately using the Frank method before surgery is needed to ensure sufficient vaginal length with less perineum. During the operation, attention is required to care for the plexus vein. Comprehensive psychological support, providing appropriate information to the patient for mental maturity, and planning surgery according to their life stages are essential for successful treatment.

Background: Japan’s health insurance covers multigene panel testing. This study aimed to determine the potential availability and utility of gene panel testing clinically in gynecologic oncology. Methods: We analyzed the characteristics of patients with gynecologic cancer who underwent gene panel testing using FoundationOne® CDx or OncoGuide™ NCC Oncopanel between November 2019 and October 2022. Results: Out of 102 patients analyzed, 32, 18, 43, 8, and 1 had cervical, endometrial, ovarian cancers, sarcoma, and vaginal cancer, respectively. Druggable gene alteration was found in 70 patients (68.6%; 21 with cervical cancer, 15 with endometrial cancer, 28 with ovarian cancer, 5 with sarcoma, and 1 with other). The most common druggable gene alteration was PIK3CA mutation (n = 21), followed by PTEN mutation (n = 12) and high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) (n = 11). TMB-H was detected in 5 patients with cervical cancer, 5 with endometrial cancer, and 1 with endometrial stromal sarcoma. Eleven patients (10.8%) received molecularly targeted therapy according to their gene aberrations. Gene panel testing was mostly performed when the second-line treatment was ineffective. Of all 102 patients, 60 did not have recommended treatment, and 15 died or had worsened conditions before obtaining the test results. Conclusion: Through multigene panel testing, although many patients had druggable gene alterations, 10.8% of them received the recommended treatment. TMB-H was mainly observed in cervical/endometrial cancer, suggesting its potential as a therapeutic biomarker of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, patients’ prognosis and performance status should be considered before performing the test.

In recent years, rapid advancement in gene/protein analysis technology has resulted in target molecule identification that may be useful in cancer treatment. Therefore, “Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition” was published in Japan in September 2021. These guidelines were established to align the clinical usefulness of external diagnostic products with the evaluation criteria of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. The guidelines were scoped for each tumor, and a clinical questionnaire was developed based on a serious clinical problem. This guideline was based on a careful review of the evidence obtained through a literature search, and recommendations were identified following the recommended grades of the Medical Information Network Distribution Services (Minds). Therefore, this guideline can be a tool for cancer treatment in clinical practice. We have already reported the review portion of “Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition” as Part 1. Here, we present the English version of each part of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Molecular Tumor Marker, Second Edition.