Writer Profile

Kenichi Fujii
Other : Chief Senior Researcher, National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyKeio University alumni

Kenichi Fujii
Other : Chief Senior Researcher, National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyKeio University alumni
2019/03/18
What are Units?
Do you ever find yourself casually measuring your weight, body temperature, or waistline? (Some of you might be measuring quite carefully for the sake of a diet). When you discuss those measurement results with family or doctors, you need "units."
A unit is a scale that represents the magnitude of a physical quantity, so a physical quantity is expressed as the product of a numerical value and a unit. Since the way numerical values are expressed using the decimal system is already unified, as long as the units are unified, people can correctly understand the magnitude of physical quantities across national borders. This is important not only for science and technology but also for commerce, industry, and trade. For this reason, several basic units have been used since ancient times, but today, a common global system of units called the International System of Units (SI) is used.
The SI has seven base units. For example, the "meter" was defined around the time of the French Revolution as one ten-millionth of the length of the meridian from the North Pole to the Equator. Later, with the advent of the theory of relativity, it was redefined as the distance light travels in a certain amount of time, utilizing the law that the speed of light is constant. The "second" was also previously defined by the period of the Earth's rotation or revolution, but it is now defined by the vibration period of a cesium atomic clock. The "candela," whose name is derived from the word for candle, was once based on the brightness of a single candle, but is now defined in terms of the energy of electromagnetic waves.
Background Leading to the Definition Revision
In this way, physical quantities of a magnitude that can be perceived by the human five senses were chosen for SI units, but as science and technology progressed, their definitions underwent transitions and evolved into definitions with higher universality.
However, the "kilogram," the unit of mass, has not changed once since it was defined in 1889 by an artificial weight called the International Prototype of the Kilogram. The mass standards of each country have been maintained by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) in the suburbs of Paris, which periodically calibrates the kilogram prototypes (replicas of the international prototype) distributed to member countries of the Metre Convention against the international prototype.
However, as an artificial object, there are limits to its stability. Comparisons between the international prototype and national prototypes over the past 100 years have revealed that the mass of the prototypes gradually increases due to surface contamination and other factors, and the limit of stability as a unit is about 5 parts in 100 million. For this reason, research to change the definition using modern methods has been underway for quite some time.
Even so, the revision of the kilogram definition did not happen for a long time. It could be said that the stability of the mass of the platinum-iridium alloy, forged using vacuum metallurgy—the cutting-edge technology of 130 years ago—was just that excellent. Engineers at the time even stated that if this alloy were used, its mass would likely not change even after 10,000 years. Because of this, until very recently, it was impossible to measure physical constants such as the Avogadro constant and the Planck constant with a precision that exceeded that stability. In the 2012 scientific journal "Nature," the revision of the kilogram definition was listed as one of the five major unsolved problems in physics, alongside gravity wave detection.
However, in recent years, measurements with precision exceeding this became possible. At the General Conference held in November 2018 based on the Metre Convention, it was adopted to simultaneously redefine the kilogram, ampere, kelvin, and mole using the Planck constant, elementary charge, Boltzmann constant, and Avogadro constant, respectively. The new definitions will take effect from World Metrology Day on May 20, 2019.
Encounter with the Avogadro Constant
When I was in the university's faculty of engineering, the world was in the midst of the oil crisis. That sparked my interest in energy conservation research, and under Professor Koichi Watanabe (now Professor Emeritus) of the Department of Mechanical Engineering, I conducted research to improve energy efficiency by precisely measuring the thermal properties of substances. However, the measuring equipment used for that was expensive, so I couldn't get research funding without fully explaining the necessity.
Around that time, I learned that there was a research institution in Tsukuba called the National Research Laboratory of Metrology (now the National Metrology Institute of Japan at the National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology), and thinking I could perform measurements with the highest precision there, I went for a job interview in the summer of 1983. At that time, I happened to meet a researcher in the laboratory cafeteria. He said he was conducting research to change the definition of the kilogram. It was then that I first learned that the definition had not changed since it was defined by an artificial weight called the International Prototype of the Kilogram at the end of the 19th century.
Immediately after joining, I joined a study to remeasure the density of water. Water is used when measuring the density or volume of other substances, but its value had last been measured at the end of the 19th century. Therefore, I conducted research to precisely remeasure the density of water using the volume as a standard, measuring the diameter of a quartz glass sphere with a laser interferometer.
Around this time, it became possible in Japan to polish silicon crystals into spheres. To measure the Avogadro constant using a method called the X-ray crystal density method and realize a new definition of the kilogram from the number of atoms, precise values for density are required in addition to the lattice constant (interatomic distance) and molar mass (isotopic abundance ratio) of the silicon crystal. For this reason, I, who had already developed a laser interferometer to measure the diameter of quartz glass spheres, was put in charge of measuring the density of silicon crystal spheres. Then, in 1988, the NRLM Avogadro Group was formed.
At the time, we started with five people measuring the lattice constant and density of silicon crystals. We had the enthusiasm to achieve something with our own hands that no one had been able to do for 100 years, but measuring the number of atoms with a precision exceeding the stability of the prototype was difficult, and the project even faced a crisis. The leader at the time even told an interviewer from the National Museum of Nature and Science, "It will probably be impossible to change the definition of the kilogram while we are alive."
A few years later, we succeeded in measuring the Avogadro constant, but prospects for improving precision were hard to come by. At that time, the precision of the silicon crystal density measurement I was in charge of was limited to 9 parts in 100 million. We were unable to break through the wall of 5 parts in 100 million, which was the stability of the prototype. There was also a period when I sought other methods, stayed at the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the U.S.—our rival—and challenged myself to realize a new definition of the kilogram using the Planck constant.
International Exchange that Supported the Research
The turning point came in 2002 after I returned to Japan. We received an invitation from a German research group conducting similar research to ours. They asked if we would like to try enriching the silicon isotopes used as the crystal material. I intuitively felt that if we could do this, we could improve precision all at once, but that enrichment required a huge sum of money, comparable to making an atomic bomb. It was also technically difficult and required enrichment using Russian nuclear technology. However, we gradually gained the understanding of the institute, and this isotope enrichment project began in 2004. From around this time, I served as a coordinator for international projects with Germany, Italy, and the BIPM, and as a project leader within AIST, I aimed for further improvements in precision.
Subsequently, this international project proceeded smoothly, and in 2007, crystals enriched only with silicon of mass number 28 (28Si) were obtained. From these crystals, two 1-kilogram crystal spheres were polished, and we developed a laser interferometer (photo) capable of measuring their diameters with a precision nearly equal to the interatomic distance. We then newly developed surface analysis technology and succeeded in improving the measurement precision of crystal density to 2 parts in 100 million. We had finally reached the precision required to change the definition of the kilogram.
In 2011, the first measurement results for the Avogadro constant with a precision surpassing the stability of the prototype were obtained. We continued to make improvements, and several sets of data with sufficient precision to convince the world were obtained.
In 2017, to determine the value of the Planck constant to be used for the new definition of the kilogram, an adjustment of physical constants was conducted by the Committee on Data for Science and Technology (CODATA). Ultimately, eight sets of data were selected. Four of them were the values of the Avogadro constant measured jointly by AIST and research institutions in Germany and Italy, converted into the Planck constant, and one of those was the measurement result from AIST alone. Japan left an achievement that contributed greatly to the first revision of the kilogram definition in 130 years. This was the first time in history that Japan played a decisive role in the definition of the International System of Units.
Then, in November 2018, at the General Conference of the Metre Convention held in Versailles, the revision of the kilogram definition was adopted. This was exactly 30 years after I began this research.
What the New Definition Brings
The greatest benefit brought by the revision of the kilogram definition is that anyone with the technology will be able to have a mass standard based on the Planck constant, without relying on the prototype stored at the BIPM near Paris. This is the same as how the definition of length was replaced by the speed of light, and as long as one can measure the frequency of light, anyone can have a standard for length.
Furthermore, the minimum mass that could be measured with the previous definition was limited to about 1 microgram. Since the new definition does not require relying on weights, if new measurement technologies linked to the Planck constant are developed, it will become possible to measure mass in even smaller domains. Such measurement technologies will contribute widely to biotechnology, nanotechnology, and other fields through, for example, the development of new drugs, measurement of fine particles in the environment, inkjet technology, and mass measurement of semiconductor devices.
History shows that new definitions of units create several breakthroughs and have the effect of encouraging the emergence of newer technologies. I hope that more stakeholders will understand the importance of supporting such long-cycle basic research.
*Affiliations and titles are as of the time of publication.