Published papers

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) benefits atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with heart failure (HF). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a marker of left-ventricular pressure load, may serve as a potential surrogate for predicting quality of life (QOL) in a broader range of patients. Methods: Within the multicenter KiCS-AF registry, 491 AF patients underwent CA without clinical HF (e.g., documented history of HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%, or BNP levels ≥ 100 pg/mL). Participants, aged 61 ± 10 years, were categorized by baseline BNP quartiles. Atrial Fibrillation Effect on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire assessments were assessed at baseline and 1 year. Results: A lower baseline BNP correlated with reduced AFEQT scores. Post CA, all groups showed significant AFEQT score improvements. The lower-BNP group displayed notable enhancements (18.2 ± 1.2, 15.0 ± 1.1, 12.6 ± 1.2, 13.6 ± 1.2, p < 0.005), especially in symptom and treatment concern areas. Even those with normal BNP levels (≤18.4 pg/mL) exhibited significant QOL improvements. Comparing paroxysmal AF (PAF) and non-PAF groups, the PAF group, especially with higher BNP levels, showed greater AFEQT score improvements. Conclusions: This study establishes BNP as a predictive marker for QOL enhancement in non-HF patients undergoing CA for AF. BNP levels represent AF stages, with individuals in earlier stages, especially within normal BNP levels, experiencing greater QOL improvements.

Background: Recent trials on novel heart failure (HF) treatments (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, and ivabradine) emphasize the use of conventional medical therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers [BB], and mineral corticosteroid receptor antagonists). We aimed to evaluate the prescription rate of conventional medical therapy and its association with long-term outcomes in patients eligible for recent trials. Methods: We examined 1295 consecutive patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) from a multicenter registry (WET-HF registry). We assessed conventional medical therapy implementation among patients meeting the PARADIGM-HF/DAPA-HF and SHIFT enrollment criteria. We also examined the association between conventional medical therapy use and long-term outcomes within each enrollment criterion. Results: Overall, 62.2% and 35.3% of HFrEF patients met the enrollment criteria of the PARADIGM-HF/DAPA-HF and SHIFT trials. Only 33.9% and 31.9% received full conventional medical therapy within each patient subset. Notably, 84.2% of patients who met the SHIFT enrollment criteria were on BB, and only 23.0% and 4.4% were on ≥50% or the full recommended dose, respectively. Implementation of full conventional medical therapy use was associated with lower 2-year mortality and HF readmission rates in the PARADIGM-HF/ DAPA-HF eligible group (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50–0.92). The use of BB at ≥50% of the recommended dose was associated with lower 2-year mortality and HF readmission rates in the SHIFT-eligible group (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.84). Conclusions: Conventional medical therapy was underutilized among patients eligible for novel trials within a Japanese HF registry. Further efforts to optimize conventional medical therapy are needed.

BACKGROUND: Pursuing initial invasive or conservative management of chronic coronary disease (CCD) is a preference-sensitive decision that should include shared decision-making. Communicating the benefits of either approach is challenging, as individual patients rarely achieve the population-Averaged outcomes reported in clinical trials. Our objective was to develop a patient decision aid (PDA) with patient-specific estimates of outcomes for initial invasive versus conservative management of CCD, based on the ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches). METHODS: This was a multiphase mixed-methods study using focus groups of outpatients with CCD, caregivers, clinicians, and researchers. Focus groups were held in Kansas City, MO and New York City, NY between September 2021 and June 2022. Patients with CCD were included if they had a positive stress test within 1 year. Phase 1 focused on patient priorities for outcomes to guide treatment decisions. Phase 2 involved PDA development and refinement. Phase 3 involved further refinement and member checking. Key themes involving shared decision-making and treatment preferences were elicited from focus groups using a deductive approach to develop a PDA representing the outcomes most important to patients. RESULTS: Of 46 patient and caregiver participants, the mean age was 63.5 years, 53% were female, 61% were White, 24% were Black, and 9% were Hispanic. When deciding between treatments, participants valued shared decision-making but generally deferred decisions to clinicians. The outcomes most important to participants were survival and quality of life, followed by physical functioning and symptoms. To represent these outcomes, participants favored simple visualizations, such as a speedometer or health meter. When deciding between treatment options, participants preferred to use the PDA collaboratively with a clinician instead of as a stand-Alone tool. CONCLUSIONS: Our novel, patient-centered approach to developing a PDA for CCD with patient-specific outcomes has the potential to rapidly translate clinical trial results to individual patients and support shared decision-making.

Aims: The discontinuation of oral anticoagulants (OACs) remains as a significant concern in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). The discontinuation rate may vary depending on management strategy, and physicians may also discontinue OACs due to concerns about patient satisfaction with their care. We aimed to assess the incidence of OAC discontinuation and its relationship to patients’ health in an outpatient AF registry. Methods and Results: From a multicenter registry for newly recognized AF patients (n = 3313), we extracted 1647 (49.7%) patients with OACs and a CHA2DS2-Vasc score of ≥2. Discontinuation was defined as sustained cessation of OACs within a 1-year follow-up. We examined predictors associated with discontinuation and its relations to health status defined by the AFEQT questionnaire. Of the 1647 patients, 385 (23.6%) discontinued OACs after 1 year, with discontinuation rates varying across treatment strategies (15.3% for catheter ablation, 4.9% for rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs, and 3.0% for rate control). Successful rhythm control was associated with discontinuation in the catheter ablation (OR 6.61, 95% CI 3.00–14.6, p < 0.001) and antiarrhythmic drugs (OR 6.47, 95% CI 2.62–15.9, p < 0.001) groups, whereas the incidence of bleeding events within 1 year was associated with discontinuation in the rate control group. One-year AFEQT scores did not significantly differ between patients who discontinued OACs and those who did not in each treatment strategy group. Conclusions: OAC discontinuation was common among AF patients with significant stroke risk but varied depending on the chosen treatment strategy. This study also found no significant association between OAC discontinuation and patients’ health status.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and heart failure (HF) possess mutual risk factors and share a common pathophysiological pathway. Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a known predictor of adverse events in patients with HF. However, its implications on patients with atrial fibrillation in its early stage remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 2211 patients without previous HF diagnosis were extracted from a prospective, multicenter registry of newly diagnosed patients with atrial fibrillation. TR was categorized as absent, mild, moderate, and severe based on the American Society of Echocardiography recommendations. The primary outcome was time to first hospitalization for HF after enrollment. The Atrial Fibrillation Effects on Quality-of-Life scores were compared. Overall, 1107 patients (50.1%) had TR (42.3%, 7.2%, and 0.6% for mild, moderate, and severe, respectively). During follow-up (median 730 [interquartile range, 366–731] days), 44 patients (2.0%) expe-rienced HF hospitalization, and the incidence increased with severity of TR (P<0.001). TR was an associated predictor of the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.51, P=0.050; HR: 6.19, P=0.008; for moderate and severe TR versus no TR). Changes in AFEQT overall score were negatively related to TR severity (8.7±17.5 versus 8.5±17.0 versus 3.1±17.5 versus 1.4±11.8, absent versus mild versus moderate versus severe TR, respectively), although it was not an independent predictor after adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: TR severity at atrial fibrillation diagnosis was an associated predictor of subsequent hospitalization for HF, which may warrant the need for a more intensive follow-up and HF-related management.

Background: Quantifying guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensity is foundational for improving heart failure (HF) care. Existing measures discount dose intensity or use inconsistent weighting. Methods: The Kansas City Medical Optimization (KCMO) score is the average of total daily to target dose percentages for eligible GDMT, reflecting the percentage of optimal GDMT prescribed (range, 0-100). In Change the Management of Patients With HF, we computed KCMO, HF collaboratory (0-7), and modified HF Collaboratory (0-100) scores for each patient at baseline and for 1-year change in established GDMT at the time (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, β-blocker, ACE [angiotensin-converting enzyme] inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor). We compared baseline and 1-year change distributions and the coefficient of variation (SD/mean) across scores. Results: Among 4532 patients at baseline, mean KCMO, HF collaboratory, and modified HF Collaboratory scores were 38.8 (SD, 25.7), 3.4 (1.7), and 42.2 (22.2), respectively. The mean 1-year change (n=4061) for KCMO was -1.94 (17.8); HF collaborator, -0.11 (1.32); and modified HF Collaboratory, -1.35 (19.8). KCMO had the highest coefficient of variation (0.66), indicating greater variability around the mean than the HF collaboratory (0.49) and modified HF Collaboratory (0.53) scores, reflecting higher resolution of the variability in GDMT intensity across patients. Conclusions: KCMO measures GDMT intensity by incorporating dosing and treatment eligibility, provides more granularity than existing methods, is easily interpretable (percentage of ideal GDMT), and can be adapted as performance measures evolve. Further study of its association with outcomes and its usefulness for quality assessment and improvement is needed.

Background: Prior studies of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors (SMuRFs), such as diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking, reported higher in-hospital but lower long-term mortality than those with SMuRFs. However, the impact of SMuRFs on health status outcomes (patients’ symptoms, function, and quality of life) after a first AMI are unknown. Methods: Data from 2 prospective registries, PREMIER and TRIUMPH, were used to identify patients with no prior history of coronary disease hospitalized at 31 U.S. hospitals for AMI between 2003 and 2008. Serial health status over 12 months was collected using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) Summary Score. Changes in SAQ over 12 months were compared between patients with and without SMuRFs using hierarchical linear mixed models with sequential adjustments for baseline SAQ scores, clinical, and sociodemographic characteristics. Results: Among 4076 patients with a first AMI (mean age 58.4 ± 12.4, 34% female, 22% Black), 569 (14.0%) presented without SMuRFs. Compared with patients with SMuRFs, those without SMuRFs were more likely to be male, White, have higher income and education, fewer depressive symptoms, and higher baseline SAQ Summary Scores (83.5 ± 13.2 vs. 79.6 ± 16.5). After adjusting for baseline SAQ scores, patients without SMuRFs had larger SAQ Summary Score improvements at 12 months than those with SMuRFs (adjusted difference between groups = 2.61 points, 95% CI: 1.29-3.93), but sequential adjustment for clinical and socioeconomic characteristics attenuated this difference (1.69 points, 95% CI 0.40-1.97). Conclusions: Among AMI patients, those without modifiable risk factors had similar health status at 12-months as compared with those having modifiable cardiovascular risk factors, which should provide reassurance to those with less targets for secondary prevention.

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) at the highest risk of progression to heart failure (HF) need to be identified. We investigated whether QRS duration can stratify patients with AF at risk for poor clinical outcomes, including health-related quality of life (HR-QoL). We analyzed data from a multicenter registry-based cohort study of patients with AF. Patients were grouped according to the QRS duration (narrow: <120 ms; wide: ≥120 ms) at registration (baseline). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and HF hospitalizations during a 2-year follow-up. In addition, the AF effect on the quality-of-life overall summary score was compared between the groups. In 3,269 patients, 302 (9.2%) had a wide QRS; these patients were more likely to be older, male, and have higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores than those with a narrow QRS. The incidence of the composite outcome was higher in patients with a wide QRS than those with a narrow QRS (13.1% vs 4.9%, p <0.001). After adjustment, a wide QRS was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.09 to 2.29, p = 0.016), and the results persisted after the exclusion of patients with bundle branch block or cardiac implantable electronic devices. Regarding HR-QoL outcomes, patients with a wide QRS were less likely to improve AF effect on quality-of-life overall summary scores at 1 year than those with a narrow QRS (adjusted difference −2.31, 95% confidence interval −4.06 to −0.57, p = 0.009). QRS prolongation, even for a nonspecific conduction disturbance, was an independent predictor of adverse outcomes and worse HR-QoL in patients with AF.

BACKGROUND: The ISCHEMIA trial (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) demonstrated greater health status benefits with an initial invasive strategy, as compared with a conservative one, for patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia. Whether these benefits vary globally is important to understand to support global adoption of the results. METHODS: We analyzed participants' disease-specific health status using the validated 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ: >5-point differences are clinically important) at baseline and over 1-year follow-up across 37 countries in 6 international regions. The average effect of initial invasive versus conservative strategies on 1-year SAQ scores was estimated using Bayesian proportional odds regression and compared across regions. RESULTS: Considerable regional variation in baseline health status was observed among 4617 participants (mean age=64.4±9.5 years, 24% women), with the mean SAQ summary scores of 67.4±19.5 in Eastern Europe participants (17% of the total), 71.4±15.4 in Asia-Pacific (18%), 74.9±16.7 in Central and South America (10%), 75.5±19.5 in Western Europe (26%), and 78.6±19.2 in North America (28%). One-year improvements in SAQ scores were greater in regions with lower baseline scores with initial invasive management (17.7±20.9 in Eastern Europe and 11.4±19.3 in North America), but similar in the conservative arm. Adjusting for baseline SAQ scores, similar health status benefits of an initial invasive strategy on 1-year SAQ scores were observed (ranging from 2.38 points [95% CI, 0.04-4.50] in North America to 4.66 points [95% CI, 2.46-6.94] in Eastern Europe), with an 88.3% probability that the difference in benefit across regions was <5 points. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, initial invasive management was associated with a consistent health status benefit across regions, with modest regional variability, supporting the international generalizability of health status benefits from invasive management of chronic coronary disease.

Importance: The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a commonly used outcome in heart failure trials. While comparing means between treatment groups improves statistical power, mean treatment effects do not necessarily reflect the clinical benefit experienced by individual patients. Objective: To evaluate the association between mean KCCQ treatment effects and the proportions of patients experiencing clinically important improvements across a range of clinical trials and heart failure etiologies. Design, Setting, and Participants: A patient-level analysis of 11 randomized clinical trials, including 9977 patients, was performed to examine the association between mean treatment effects and the KCCQ Overall Summary Score (OSS) and the absolute differences in the proportions of patients experiencing clinically important (≥5 points) and moderate to large (≥10 points) improvements. There was no target date range, and included studies were those for which patient-level data were available. Validation was performed in 7 additional trials. The data were analyzed between July 1 and September 15, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of patients experiencing an improvement of 5 or more and 10 or more points in their KCCQ score (with each domain transformed to a range of 0 to 100 points, where higher scores represent better health status). Results: Group mean KCCQ-OSS differences were strongly correlated with absolute differences in clinically important changes (Spearman correlations 0.76-0.92). For example, a mean KCCQ-OSS treatment effect of 2.5 points (half of a minimally important difference for an individual patient) was associated with an absolute difference of 6.0% (95% prediction interval [PI], 4.0%-8.1%) in the proportion of patients improving 5 or more points and 5.0% (95% PI, 3.1%-7.0%) in the proportion improving 10 or more points, corresponding to a number needed to treat of 17 (95% PI, 12-25) and 20 (95% PI, 14-33), respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Inferences about clinical impacts based on population-level mean treatment effects may be misleading, since even small between-group differences may reflect clinically important treatment benefits for individual patients. Results of this study suggest that clinical trials should explicitly describe the distributions of KCCQ change at the patient level within treatment groups to support the clinical interpretation of their results.

Background: Early identification of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients at risk for heart failure (HF) remains critical for improving their outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether indices of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) can stratify AF patients without clinical history of HF. Methods: We extracted 1775 patients’ data from a prospective cohort that consecutively recruited recently recognized AF patients with ejection fraction ≥50%. We categorized patients as LVDD grade 0 (none) to 3 (severe) based on mitral deceleration time and E/e’ per the American Society of Echocardiography recommendation. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, and HF hospitalization during the 2-year follow-up. We also investigated the Atrial Fibrillation Effects on QualiTy-of-Life (AFEQT) scores. Results: Overall, 857 (48.3%) had mild or higher LVDD. Incidence of primary outcomes increased in parallel with LVDD grading (1.8%, 2.8%, 6.5%, and 8.1% for grades 0–3, respectively, p < 0.001), and the presence of grade 3 LVDD was an independent predictor of the primary outcome (adjusted HR 2.28 (vs. grade 0), 95%CI 1.13–4.60). Furthermore, patients with LVDD had lower AFEQT scores at the enrollment and 1-year follow-up. Conclusions: LVDD indices were associated with adverse clinical outcomes and patients’ perceived health status in a recently diagnosed AF cohort without HF.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary quality initiatives emphasize minimizing contrast volume as a key modifiable factor to prevent acute kidney injury (AKI) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Left-digit bias is a cognitive bias where the leftmost digit of a number disproportionately influences decisions. This bias may unintentionally affect contrast administration when interpreting laboratory values like serum creatinine. Therefore, we aim to assess the impact of left-digit bias in serum creatinine level on contrast volume in PCI. METHODS: We analyzed patients undergoing PCI between January 2018 and December 2022 using the Japanese nationwide prospective multicenter registry. The primary outcome was PCI contrast volume. Left-digit bias was assessed by comparing contrast volume differences at specific creatinine thresholds (eg, 1.0 mg/dL and 2.0 mg/dL). AKI risks were calculated by a validated risk scoring system. RESULTS: Among 735 696 PCI procedures, the median contrast volume was 117 mL (interquartile range 85–157 mL). Analysis of average contrast volume revealed a sharp decrease at baseline creatinine levels above versus less than 1 mg/dL (mean difference, 2.2 mL [95% CI, 1.6–2.8]) and 2 mg/dL (4.7 [95% CI, 1.6–7.8]) but not at 3 mg/dL (−2.0 [95% CI, −10.0 to 6.0]). Despite differences at integer thresholds of creatinine, minimal variation across AKI risk levels suggests operators prioritize creatinine values over predicted AKI risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides valuable insights into contemporary trends in contrast volume for PCI and identifies left-digit bias in creatinine interpretation affecting contrast administration. Formal risk stratification is essential to optimize contrast use for AKI prevention.

An accurate prediction of major adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) improves clinical decisions and specific interventions. To determine whether machine learning (ML) techniques predict peri-PCI adverse events [acute kidney injury (AKI), bleeding, and in-hospital mortality] with better discrimination or calibration than the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR-CathPCI) risk scores, we developed logistic regression and gradient descent boosting (XGBoost) models for each outcome using data from a prospective, all-comer, multicenter registry that enrolled consecutive coronary artery disease patients undergoing PCI in Japan between 2008 and 2020. The NCDR-CathPCI risk scores demonstrated good discrimination for each outcome (C-statistics of 0.82, 0.76, and 0.95 for AKI, bleeding, and in-hospital mortality) with considerable calibration. Compared with the NCDR-CathPCI risk scores, the XGBoost models modestly improved discrimination for AKI and bleeding (C-statistics of 0.84 in AKI, and 0.79 in bleeding) but not for in-hospital mortality (C-statistics of 0.96). The calibration plot demonstrated that the XGBoost model overestimated the risk for in-hospital mortality in low-risk patients. All of the original NCDR-CathPCI risk scores for adverse periprocedural events showed adequate discrimination and calibration within our cohort. When using the ML-based technique, however, the improvement in the overall risk prediction was minimal.

Aims: The purpose of this study is to utilize patient-reported outcomes to determine the percentage of patients concerned about mild to moderate bleeding side effects of anticoagulants. Methods and results: We consecutively enrolled 3312 newly diagnosed or referred patients for atrial fibrillation (AF) management from 11 sites within the Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies-Atrial Fibrillation registry between September 2012 and May 2018. Of these patients, 2636 (79.5%) were taking oral anticoagulants at enrollment. Using the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-life questionnaire (AFEQT), the patients who responded '1: not at all bothered' or '2: hardly bothered' on the seven-point scale regarding bleeding side effects were classified as the 'no OAC concern' group while those responding '3: a little bothered' to '7: extremely bothered' were classified as the 'OAC concern' group. On baseline analysis, 29.3% (n = 772) were 'concerned' about bleeding side effects. The proportion of women and patients with AF-related symptoms was higher in the oral anticoagulant (OAC) concern vs. no OAC concern group (36.9% vs. 29.8%, P < 0.0004 and 66.2% vs. 56.7%, P < 0.0001, respectively). The CHADS2 scores ≥ 2 were comparable between groups. Of the 430 patients in the 1-year follow-up analysis, the proportion of the continued OAC concern group (1 year from enrollment) was 41.6%. The dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban usage rates were comparable between the two groups in baseline and 1-year follow-up analysis. Conclusion: Approximately one-third of all patients with AF on anticoagulant therapy were concerned regarding bleeding from short- and long-term anticoagulant use.

Aims: The impact of worsening renal function (WRF) on the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) remains controversial. We aimed to identify phenotypically distinct subgroups among individuals with both AHF and WRF using cluster analysis. Methods and results: Overall, the data of 483 patients with both AHF and WRF enrolled in the West Tokyo Heart Failure Registry were analysed. Using cluster analysis, we identified three phenotypically distinct subgroups (phenogroups 1, 2, and 3). We assessed the impact of WRF on the prognosis of each phenogroup by comparing the incidence of composite endpoints, including all-cause death and re-hospitalization due to heart failure, with those of a propensity score-matched, non-WRF control group. Participants in phenogroup 1 (N = 122) were the youngest (69.3 ± 13.7 years), had relatively preserved estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, 70.0 ± 27.7 mL/min/1.73 m2), and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (41.8 ± 13.7%). Conversely, participants in phenogroup 3 (N = 122) were the oldest (81.7 ± 8.5 years), had the worst eGFR (33.0 ± 20.9 mL/min/1.73 m2), and had preserved LVEF (51.7 ± 14.8%). The characteristics of the participants in phenogroup 2 (N = 239) were between those of phenogroups 1 and 3. The propensity score matching analysis showed that WRF was associated with a higher incidence of composite endpoints in phenogroup 1, whereas this association was not observed in phenogroups 2 and 3. Conclusions: Using cluster analysis, we revealed three phenotypically distinct subgroups of patients with both AHF and WRF. WRF was associated with worse clinical outcomes in the subgroup of younger patients with reduced LVEF and preserved renal function.

Importance: A primary objective in managing atrial fibrillation (AF) is to optimize patients' health status, which can be done only if physicians accurately quantify the outcomes associated with AF in patients' lives. Objective: To explore physicians' estimation of the health status of patients with AF and its association with subsequent care and outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A multicenter, prospective cohort study was conducted in 2 outpatient practices in Tokyo, Japan. Participants included patients with newly diagnosed AF or those referred for initial treatment of AF at outpatient practices and treating physicians from November 8, 2018, to April 1, 2020. Data analysis was performed from December 22, 2022, to July 7, 2023. Exposures: Participating patients completed the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire, a 20-item tool covering 4 domains with a 7-point Likert scale; 3 domains (symptoms, daily activities, and treatment concerns) were used in this study. Blinded to patients' responses, treating physicians answered a 3-item questionnaire quantifying each patient's AFEQT domain with a single item. Patients' mean Likert scale responses within each AFEQT domain were subtracted from the physicians' assessments so that higher scores (≥0.5 points) indicate physician underestimation, while lower scores (≤0.5 points) indicate physician overestimation of the health status of patients with AF. Main Outcomes and Measures: The independent association of physician-patient concordance with treatment escalation (alteration or initiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, cardioversion, or catheter ablation) and 1-year adjusted changes in AFEQT scores. Results: Among 330 patients (238 [72.1%] men; mean [SD] age, 67.9 [11.9] years; 163 [49.4%] with paroxysmal AF), physicians correctly estimated health status in 112 patients (33.9%), underestimated it in 42 patients (12.7%), and overestimated it in 176 patients (53.3%). Treatment escalation occurred in 63.6% of patients whose health status was correctly estimated, 47.6% of those whose health status was underestimated, and 66.3% of patients whose health status was overestimated. After multivariable adjustment, underestimation of health status was independently associated with less treatment escalation (adjusted odds ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.90) and less frequent AFEQT overall summary score improvement at 1 year (underestimated, 2.5 [95% CI, -1.6 to 6.7] vs correctly and overestimated health status, 8.4 [95% CI, 7.0-9.9] points; P =.01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, physician underestimation of the health status of patients with AF was common and associated with less aggressive treatment and less health status improvement at 1 year..