Published papers

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) for 1 year in Japanese patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: This 52-week postmarketing study, HOPEFUL-2, enrolled patients who had completed HOPEFUL-1 for early RA, in which patients received either ADA + methotrexate (MTX) or MTX alone in a 26-week randomised phase, followed by ADA+MTX in a 26-week open-label phase. Results: A total of 220 patients (ADA discontinuation: 114 patients vs ADA continuation: 106 patients) were enrolled in this study. The proportion of patients with sustained low disease activity (LDA) in the ADA discontinuation group was significantly lower than that in the continuation group (80% (64/80 patients) vs 97% (71/73 patients); p=0.001); however, most patients sustained LDA in both groups. In patients with 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28)-C reactive protein ≤2.0 at week 52, the proportion of patients who achieved sustained LDA at week 104 was 93%, suggesting that DAS28 remission may be a predictor to indicate biologicalfree disease control in patients with early RA. The incidence of adverse events (AE) was significantly lower in the ADA discontinuation group than in the continuation group (34.2% (39/114 patients) vs 48.1% (51/106 patients); p=0.04), most notably for infection (14.9% vs 27.4%, p=0.031). Conclusions: Although ADA discontinuation was associated with an increase in disease activity, a large proportion of patients maintained LDA with MTX monotherapy after ADA discontinuation. Since ADA discontinuation was associated with a lower AE incidence, physicians should weigh the risks and benefits of ADA discontinuation.

We herein report a case of renal sarcoidosis presenting as acute kidney injury (AKI) during treatment with etanercept for rheumatoid arthritis. Blood tests showed a high level of angiotensin-converting enzyme and a renal biopsy demonstrated non-caseating granulomatous tubulointerstitial nephritis. The administration of high-dose steroid therapy (1 mg/kg) and discontinuation of etanercept resulted in an improvement in the patient’s renal function. Although renal sarcoidosis induced by anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is an extremely rare manifestation, this case suggests that renal sarcoidosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of AKI in patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, as providing an early diagnosis and treatment is important for preventing irreversible renal impairment.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by chronic inflammatory synovitis that causes pain, loss of function and disability, and can significantly reduce health-related quality of life. Improved understanding of the pathogenesis has led to the development of new biologic treatments that target specific cytokines. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted to show the efficacy of anti-TNF and IL-6. However, despite these treatments, some patients fail to respond to these therapies. Recently other anti-ctyokine treatments had been developed and introduced. Here, we discuss about new anti-cytokine treatments for RA.

With the current use of biologics in RA, numerous patients can achieve clinical remission, however structural joint damage occurs in substantial numbers of the patients. The present study assessed cartilage damage during 54-week anti-TNF therapy, using serum cartilage markers, and potential advantages of these markers were evaluated. Levels of serum hyaluronan decreased with decreasing levels of CRP in both early and established RA, whereas indicator of type II collagen synthesis/degradation, C2C/CP II decreased only in early RA group. Levels of COMP and keratin sulfate significantly decreased and increased compared to baseline, respectively, by week 54 in established RA. Strikingly, C2C/CP II levels were universally improved in early RA, regardless of CRP levels or EULAR response grade. In contrast, C2C/CP II levels universally worsened in established RA, even though patients achieved good response. As a role of surrogate marker reflecting therapeutic efficacy of biological therapy, C2C/CP II appears particularly useful for determining the degree of ongoing structural joint deterioration, which is dissociated from clinical assessment of disease activity in RA.

Pharmacological management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been rapidly progressed in recent years, which is appeared in the "treat to target" movement and the recommendations developed by some established international/domestic rheumatology associations. The baseline evaluation of poor prognostic factors as well as disease activity with composite measures is necessary for a personalized management. Methotrexate is currently the anchor drug, and other conventional or biological antirheumatic drugs should be added to it for refractory patients. The development of various novel agents including signal transduction inhibitors should promote further advances in the management of RA and other systemic autoimmune and/or inflammatory diseases.

© 2017 The Author(s). Background: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) transduces signals via phosphorylation of STAT3 (pSTAT3). Tocilizumab (TCZ) is an IL-6 receptor blocker, which, when administered intravenously every 4 weeks, efficiently ameliorates rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Since IL-6 signal strength varies among patients with RA, the intensity necessary for appropriate IL-6 signal inhibition by TCZ might vary between individuals. In a previous study, we have examined the clinical utility of increasing (dosing interval shortened to 3 weeks) and decreasing (interval extended to 5 weeks) the dose frequency of TCZ. However, there is currently no established method for accurately measuring the strength of IL-6 signal inhibition by TCZ among individual patients. We therefore sought to develop such an assay. Methods: Whole blood samples were collected from RA patients with low disease activity (clinical disease activity index (CDAI)≤10) who were treated with TCZ at dosing intervals of 3 weeks (3-week group, n=10), 4 weeks (4-week group, n=10) or 5 weeks (5-week group, n=10), or with methotrexate (control group, n=10). Recombinant human IL-6 (0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100 ng/ml) was exogenously added to whole blood and the proportion of pSTAT3-positive CD4+ T cells (%pSTAT3+/CD4+) was measured by Phosflow cytometric analysis. Results: The addition of exogenous IL-6 increased the proportion of pSTAT3-positive CD4+ T cells in a dose-dependent manner in each group. Inhibition of IL-6 signaling was strongest in the 3-week dosing group, followed by the 4-week, 5-week and control group. Significant differences in %pSTAT3+/CD4+ cells were observed between dose interval groups when stimulated with 10 ng/ml and 100 ng/ml of IL-6. Conclusion: Assessment of the proportion of pSTAT3-positive CD4+ T cells under IL-6 stimulation is a highly sensitive and useful method for determining differences in the strength of IL-6 signal inhibition in patients treated with TCZ. It is suggested that different TCZ treatment intervals were necessary to lower disease activity in each group of patients, and these findings also indicate that the IL-6 signaling pathway may differ in each RA patient. Our assay may support strategies for optimizing TCZ treatment in RA patients.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Objectives: To evaluate efficacy and safety of abatacept+methotrexate (MTX) in biologic-naive, anticitrullinated protein antibody (ACPA)-positive Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and early erosion versus placebo+MTX. Methods: In this phase IV, multicentre, double-blind study (NCT01758198), patients were randomised (1:1) to receive intravenous abatacept (~10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus MTX (≥6 mg/week). Primary efficacy objectives were to compare American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response rates at week 16 and mean change from baseline in van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score (vdH-mTSS) at week 24 between abatacept+MTX and placebo+MTX groups. Results: Overall, 203 and 202 patients received abatacept+MTX and placebo+MTX, respectively. At week 16, ACR20 response rates were higher in the abatacept (75.4%) versus placebo group (27.7%; p<0.001). Mean change from baseline in vdH-mTSS at week 24 was 0.84 in the abatacept and 1.26 in the placebo group (p=0.017). Radiographic nonprogression rates (change in vdH-mTSS≤smallest detectable change (2.4)) were 88.1% and 75.4% in abatacept and placebo groups, respectively. Adjusted mean change from baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (C-reactive protein) (DAS28 (CRP)) at week 16 demonstrated a numerically greater reduction in the abatacept versus placebo group. Proportions of patients with DAS28 (CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index and Clinical Disease Activity Index remission up to week 52 were higher in the abatacept versus placebo group. The abatacept safety profile was consistent with previous observations. Conclusions: C ompared with MTX alone, abatacept+MTX improved clinical symptoms and inhibited structural damage progression in ACPA-positive, Japanese patients with RA, early erosion and inadequate response to MTX.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of single and multiple doses of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Secondary objectives included evaluating its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and efficacy. Methods: This dose-escalation, single- and multiple-dose, multicenter, open-label study was conducted at nine sites in Japan. Seven patients were enrolled at each of three dose levels (2, 8 and 16 mg/kg) and received a single intravenous dose of abatacept on day 1 of the single-dose phase. The multiple-dose phase, at the same dose, started once the patients had completed the single-dose phase and when it was confirmed that there were no safety issues. Results: Twenty patients started the single-dose phase. Single and multiple doses of abatacept were well tolerated, and adverse events were of mild to moderate intensity. There were no discontinuations or deaths due to adverse events. The pharmacokinetics of abatacept were linear, with no notable accumulation. There were no immunogenic effects on the safety, efficacy, or pharmacokinetics of abatacept. Multiple doses of abatacept improved individual items of the American College of Rheumatology core set. Conclusion: Single and multiple doses of abatacept showed favorable tolerability and efficacy in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. © 2012 Japan College of Rheumatology.

Objective: To validate the revised Japanese Ministry of Health criteria for the diagnosis of Sjögren's syndrome (SS) (JPN) (1999), The American-European Consensus Group classification criteria for SS (AECG) (2002), and American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for SS (ACR) (2012). Methods: The study subjects were 694 patients with SS or suspected SS who were followed-up in June 2012 at ten hospitals that form part of the Research Team for Autoimmune Diseases, The Research Program for Intractable Disease by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW). All patients had been checked for all four criteria of the JPN (pathology, oral, ocular, anti-SS-A/SS-B antibodies). We studied the clinical diagnosis made by the physician in charge and the satisfaction of the above criteria. Results: Of the 694 patients, 499 patients did not have other connective tissue diseases (CTDs). SS was diagnosed in 476 patients (primary SS in 302, secondary SS in 174), whereas non-SS was diagnosed in 218 patients (without other CTDs in 197, with other CTDs in 21) by the physician in charge. The sensitivities of JPN, AECG, and ACR in the diagnosis of all forms of SS (both primary and secondary SS) were 79.6, 78.6, and 77.5 %, respectively, with respective specificities of 90.4, 90.4, and 83.5 %. The sensitivities of the same systems in the diagnosis of primary SS were 82.1, 83.1, and 79.1 %, respectively, with specificities of 90.9, 90.9, and 84.8 %, respectively. The sensitivities of the same systems in the diagnosis of secondary SS were 75.3, 70.7, and 74.7 %, respectively, with specificities of 85.7, 85.7, and 71.4 %, respectively. Conclusion: The sensitivity of JPN to all forms of SS and secondary SS, the sensitivity of AECG to primary SS, and the specificities of JPN and AECG for all forms of SS, primary SS, and secondary SS were highest in the diagnosis of SS in Japanese patients. These results indicate that the JPN criteria for the diagnosis of SS in Japanese patients are superior to ACR and AECG. © Japan College of Rheumatology 2012.