Keio University

Atsuko Iwanami: The Battle Over Calendar Reform—Europe from the Perspective of Calendar Calculation

Published: February 15, 2023

Writer Profile

  • Atsuko Iwanami

    Faculty of Science and Technology Professor

    Atsuko Iwanami

    Faculty of Science and Technology Professor

The history of the calendar is the history of human intellectual endeavor.

Calendars tailored to human activities and purposes—such as region, faith, and lifestyle—have provided rhythm and tempo to our lives. In Europe, Julius Caesar (c. 102 BC – 44 BC) designated 46 BC as having 445 days, resolving the discrepancy between one calendar year and one tropical year (the time it takes for the sun to complete one cycle) in a single stroke. Thereafter, the average year was set at 365.25 days with a leap year every four years. However, even after the implementation of this Julian calendar, the discrepancy with the tropical year was not completely resolved and continued to trouble people for a long time. This was because the tropical year, which is currently approximately 365.242189 days, was treated as 365.25 days.

A particularly contentious issue was determining the date of Easter, the most important movable feast in the Christian calendar. To ensure that the Sunday of Jesus' resurrection did not overlap with the Jewish Passover (based on a lunisolar calendar), the Council of Nicaea in 325 decreed that Easter would be the first Sunday after the full moon following the spring equinox. To accurately calculate the date of Easter, which combines the solar and lunar calendars, the method of calendar calculation known as "computus" was devised. While the electronic computer was born in the 20th century, the "computus" had already been devised as a method for calendar calculation far back in medieval Europe.

It was difficult for scholars to reach a consensus on the calculation of the Easter date, and regional differences emerged depending on which method was adopted. Among the scholars who vied over the determination of Easter was Dionysius Exiguus (c. 470 – c. 550), who was instrumental in introducing the era known today as "anno Domini" (AD).

The calendar controversy seemed to have finally reached a resolution with the Venerable Bede (c. 673 – 735), who laid the foundations of calendar law in the first half of the 8th century and was widely read throughout the Middle Ages. However, during the era of Charlemagne, fierce debates broke out among scholars once again. Charlemagne was a ruler who made educational policy, known as the Carolingian Renaissance, a pillar of his administration. He focused on developing the educational infrastructure throughout his territories and, alongside improving linguistic skills, emphasized astronomy—essential for correct calendar calculation—and sought to embark on calendar reform.

Accurate observation of celestial movements is essential for calculating a calendar that visualizes time. Since medieval Europe was a Christian society, it would be premature to assume there was no cultural or academic exchange due to a confrontational structure with non-Christians. People in medieval Europe greedily accepted cutting-edge scientific knowledge, such as the mathematics and astronomy necessary for calendar calculation, from the non-Christian Arabian world. At the end of the 10th century, Gerbert of Aurillac, who would later become Pope Sylvester II, studied in the Iberian Peninsula—which served as a window to Arabian scientific knowledge—and is said to have given lectures at the cathedral school in Reims using the astrolabe and armillary sphere he mastered there. Furthermore, contemporaries believed that it was Pope Sylvester II who introduced the prototype of Arabic numerals, which made calculations easier, to the European world. In the first half of the 12th century, he was condemned by William of Malmesbury as a man who had made a pact with the devil. While this story is reminiscent of Goethe's Faust, the 12th century saw the active translation of natural scientific knowledge from Arabic even as the Crusades were carried out intermittently, leading to the flowering of the 12th-century Renaissance.

Discussions surrounding the calendar continued even 1,400 years after the implementation of the Julian calendar. A century before Copernicus proposed the heliocentric theory in "On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres" (1543), Nicolaus Cusanus (1401–1464) wrote "On the Harmony of the Calendar" (1436), repeatedly pointing out the discrepancy between the Julian calendar year and the tropical year.

It was Pope Gregory XIII (1502–1585) who broke this deadlock. Aloysius Lilius, who received the command to calculate the optimal calendar, modified the traditional leap year system. He corrected the discrepancy between the tropical year and the calendar year by decreeing that among years divisible by 100, only those where the century number is divisible by 4 (such as 1600 and 2000) would be leap years. This new calendar was implemented in October 1582, with the day following Thursday, October 4, designated as Friday, October 15. While maintaining the order of the days of the week, they attempted to remove the 10-day discrepancy at once. However, the introduction of this Gregorian calendar caused time differences between regions. It was first accepted by Catholic countries such as Italy, Spain, and Portugal; France followed later in December of the same year, followed by the Netherlands. Protestant regions were much later; while Regensburg, a Catholic region, introduced it the following year in 1583, it was not until 1699 that it was finally introduced in Nuremberg.

Britain, which still follows its own path today, was also hesitant to introduce the new calendar. It was finally introduced in Britain in September 1752 after careful preparation, but the day following September 2 was made September 14, leading to demonstrations over the "lost 11 days." In Japan, the calendar reform was implemented on January 1, 1873. Even now, the Eastern Orthodox Church uses the Julian or Revised Julian calendar rather than the Gregorian calendar. The history of the battle over calendar reform, which seeks to grasp nature based on precise measurement, will never end.

*Affiliations and titles are those at the time of publication.